Source-linked requirements
The agent grounds its review in the attached RFP instead of a generic proposal checklist.
Upload the Word response your team is already preparing.
Include the source RFP and any approved evidence or boilerplate the response may use.
Revise maps requirements, flags missing evidence, and applies grounded improvements inline.
A polished proposal can still lose because it skipped a mandatory requirement, buried the evidence evaluators asked for, or introduced a commitment the source material does not support.
Revise reads the RFP beside the response, tracks requirement coverage, and improves the actual Word draft while keeping unsupported claims visible.
The agent grounds its review in the attached RFP instead of a generic proposal checklist.
Missing certifications, metrics, references, or commitments are flagged rather than fabricated.
Supported fixes appear directly in the document as suggestions your team can review.
This tool is designed to review and improve an existing response against the source RFP. It can help fill supported gaps, but it will not invent company evidence or commitments.
Yes. Attach the RFP first, followed by approved case studies, security answers, service levels, or boilerplate the response is allowed to use.
The agent is instructed to extract mandatory requirements, scored criteria, submission rules, limits, and requested evidence before revising the response.
Yes. Review the suggestions in Revise, then export a DOCX with tracked changes or a clean accepted copy.