The best tools for editing a thesis or manuscript yourself

Academic editors, AI add-ins, and word processors compared on the jobs a long academic document needs

Artur Sapek, Founder of Revise··11 min read·

Many people searching for thesis or manuscript editing want a human editor, and professional editing services are a separate option this guide doesn’t compare. This guide is about software you can use yourself to tighten language, fix errors, and check consistency across a long academic document before it goes to a supervisor, committee, or journal.

I have spent the past year building Revise, a word processor with an AI editing agent that appears on this list. Prices and features below come from each vendor’s own pages, linked in the sources at the end, and were checked on October 4, 2026.

Thesis and manuscript editing tools at a glance

ToolBest forFree planPaid fromAI capabilities
PaperpalAcademic edits plus journal submission checksYes (200 grammar edits a month)$12/mo (Prime)Academic grammar and consistency edits, reference checks, and 30+ journal submission checks
ReviseWhole-document AI edits as tracked changes, a choice of modelsYes (daily AI limit)$8/mo (Plus)Agent proposes text and formatting edits as suggestions. Header, footer, and page-layout changes apply directly
TrinkaProofreading a thesis file returned with tracked changesYes (5,000 words a month, read-only file proofreading)$4/mo (Premium)Academic grammar and style checks (APA, AMA, ACS, AGU, IEEE), file proofreading returned with tracked changes, citation checks
WritefullLanguage feedback in Word and OverleafYes (limited free quota)$12.50/mo (Premium)Checks a whole document or paragraph and shows each edit as a diff on a suggestion card, paraphrasing, abstract generation
Claude for WordClaude's edits as tracked changes inside WordNo (Pro plan or higher)$20/mo (Claude Pro)Cites sections, edits selections, works comment threads, tracked changes when on
GrammarlyChecks as you write across appsYes (100 AI prompts a month)$12/mo (Pro)Grammar, tone, and sentence rewrites as inline suggestions, AI detection
Microsoft WordBuilt-in Editor and Copilot in the file you already useYes (Word for the web)$9.99/mo (Microsoft 365 Personal)Copilot drafts, rewrites, and summarizes, edits in place with highlight and undo. Track Changes edits in a business preview
ChatGPTFeedback and rewrites on sections, in chat or WordYes (3 file uploads a day, 27K-token Instant context)$8/mo (ChatGPT Go)Writing blocks for revising a draft or selection, reads uploaded DOCX and PDF
Table 1: Editing tools for theses and manuscripts compared on what they are best for, free plan, cheapest paid plan for one person, and what their AI can do.
ToolWorks inHow edits appearAcademic-specific features
PaperpalWord add-in, Google Docs, Overleaf, webSuggestion cards. Manuscript check returns a file with changes to accept or rejectReference checks, 30+ journal submission checks
ReviseIts own browser editor, imports and exports .docxTracked changes, exported to Word. Layout and header changes apply directlyNo dedicated journal-submission checker documented
TrinkaWeb, Word appInline suggestions. Uploaded files returned with tracked changes on paid plansCitation checks, style corrections (APA, AMA, ACS, AGU, IEEE)
WritefullWord 2016 and later, OverleafSuggestion cards that show each edit as a diffAcademic language feedback, abstract generation
Claude for WordWord (Claude Pro and up)Word tracked changes when the mode is onFollows citation-style instructions. No dedicated journal-submission checker documented
GrammarlyWord, browsers, desktop, mobileInline suggestionsPlagiarism check on Pro
Microsoft WordWordEditor suggestions. Copilot edits, which Microsoft 365 Copilot documents recording with Track ChangesSimilarity checking and citation tools
ChatGPTWeb, desktop, mobile, Word add-inRevised text in chat or a writing block, or edits in Word through the add-inNo dedicated journal-submission checker documented
Table 2: Where each tool works, how its edits appear, and its academic-specific checks.

To try whole-document AI editing on a chapter, paste it or import a .docx below. It opens as a separate document in Revise. One request with GPT-6 Luna needs no account, and other model families need a paid plan.

Paste a chapter or to edit it as tracked changes

How we evaluated them

We use Microsoft Word as the baseline for the .docx workflows compared here. We compared each tool on five questions:

  1. Does it work where the document lives: Word, Overleaf, or Google Docs?
  2. Can you review each edit, ideally as Word tracked changes?
  3. How does it handle a document of tens of thousands of words?
  4. Does it have academic checks, such as references or journal requirements?
  5. What subscription and usage limits affect repeated editing passes?

We did not run a controlled test of these apps. Our ErrataBench benchmark measures seeded-error correction by individual AI model configurations in 2,000-word chunks of English text. It doesn’t test these apps or thesis-wide consistency (full results).

The order is an editorial recommendation based on documented workflows, not a ranking of editing accuracy. Paperpal leads for its submission checks. Revise follows for model choice and reviewable edits across whole chapters, and Trinka for proofreading a finished file. Writefull is the pick for Overleaf. Claude for Word ranks below them because it needs a paid Claude plan and has no academic-specific checks, and Grammarly, Word, and ChatGPT are general tools many writers already have.

The 8 best thesis and manuscript editing tools

1. Paperpal: Best for academic edits and submission checks

  • Free plan: Yes, 200 edits/mo
  • Paid from: $12/mo
  • Built-in AI: Paperpal

Paperpal is an academic writing assistant with a Word add-in and support for Google Docs and Overleaf. Its manuscript check runs more than 30 journal submission checks across language, references, structure, figures and tables, disclosures, and metadata, and returns an edited file with changes you accept or reject.

The free plan includes 200 grammar edits a month. Prime ($12 a month billed yearly, $25 month to month) includes 20,000 grammar and consistency edits and 10,000 words of reference checks a month. Free and Prime include a lite Journal Fit report, and Pro ($29 a month billed yearly, $59 month to month) includes the full report and unlimited Journal Fit checks. Paperpal’s help center notes that applying suggestions from the Word add-in with Track Changes on can fail.

Pick it if you are preparing a paper for journal submission. Skip it if you need the Word add-in to apply suggestions reliably with Track Changes on.

2. Revise: Best for whole-document AI edits you review

  • Free plan: Yes, daily AI limit
  • Paid from: $8/mo
  • Built-in AI: Revise Agent

Revise is a browser word processor whose AI agent works through a document in sections and proposes text and formatting edits as tracked changes. You choose GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, or Muse models, and pending suggestions export to Word as tracked changes. Header, footer, and page-layout changes apply directly. It keeps the tracked changes, comments, footnotes, and other Word features it documents, though cross-reference fields don’t update inside Revise.

The free plan runs GPT-6 Luna and Claude Haiku 5.5 under a daily AI limit. Plus ($8 a month) adds Claude Sonnet and the other model families, and the most capable models need Pro. It has no citation or journal checks, and it is a separate editor rather than a Word add-in.

Pick it if you want an AI pass over whole chapters with text and formatting edits proposed as suggestions. Skip it if you need reference or journal-requirement checks.

3. Trinka: Best for proofreading a thesis file

  • Free plan: Yes, 5,000 words/mo
  • Paid from: $4/mo
  • Built-in AI: Trinka

Trinka checks academic grammar and style, with corrections for APA, AMA, ACS, AGU, and IEEE styles, a citation checker, and a journal finder. Its Proofread File feature takes a .docx or LaTeX file and, on paid plans, returns it with tracked changes. LaTeX files also come back with a Word file of the changes.

The free plan covers 5,000 words a month, with read-only file proofreading. Premium is $48 a year (a sale price, normally $80) or $20 month to month, with 10 shared credits a month, and file proofreading uses one credit per 5,000 words. One pass over a 60,000-word thesis uses 12 credits, more than Premium includes before any other credit-based checks.

Pick it if you want a whole thesis file checked and returned as tracked changes. Skip it if you need several full passes over a long thesis each month on Premium’s credits.

4. Writefull: Best for Word and Overleaf users

  • Free plan: Yes, limited quota
  • Paid from: $12.50/mo
  • Built-in AI: Writefull

Writefull gives academic language feedback in Word 2016 and later and in Overleaf. In Word it checks the whole document or one paragraph and shows each edit on a card, with a diff of the change. It also paraphrases and generates abstracts. Writefull’s Word guide warns that footnotes, references, and special characters become plain text when you copyedit or paraphrase them.

The free plan has a limited quota, and Premium is $21 a month or $150 a year. Some university licenses include Premium features.

Pick it if you write in LaTeX on Overleaf. Skip it if you need to copyedit Word passages with live footnotes or references without converting them to text.

5. Claude for Word: Best for tracked changes inside Word

  • Free plan: No, Pro or higher
  • Paid from: $20/mo
  • Built-in AI: Claude

Claude for Word is Anthropic’s Word add-in. It reads the open document, including comments, footnotes, and tables, and with tracked changes mode on it puts its edits into Word’s review pane. It can also work through comment threads and reply to them.

It is included in Claude Pro ($20 a month, or $200 a year) and higher plans, not the Free plan, and shares Claude’s usage limits.

Pick it if you want AI edits as native Word tracked changes without leaving Word. Skip it if you need a dedicated journal-submission checker or a free option.

6. Grammarly: Best for checks as you write

  • Free plan: Yes, 100 AI prompts/mo
  • Paid from: $12/mo
  • Built-in AI: Grammarly AI

Grammarly underlines issues as you write in Word, browsers, and its apps. Its web editor and uploads take up to 100,000 characters, including spaces, while the Windows and Mac apps have no document-length cap. Usage limits of 50,000 words a day and 150,000 words a month apply. Pro adds plagiarism detection.

The free plan includes 100 AI prompts a month. Pro is $12 a month billed yearly or $30 month to month.

Pick it if you want corrections while you draft. Skip it if you plan to check more than 50,000 words in a day.

7. Microsoft Word: Best for staying in the file you already use

  • Free plan: Yes, Word for the web
  • Paid from: $9.99/mo
  • Built-in AI: Copilot

Word has Editor for spelling and grammar, free at a basic level with refinements on Microsoft 365, plus similarity checking and citation tools. Copilot can rewrite and summarize. Microsoft’s tutorial for Microsoft 365 Copilot license holders documents recording Copilot edits with Track Changes on, and we haven’t confirmed that workflow on consumer plans. Microsoft recommends working on long documents in chunks and says Copilot may give less attention to the middle of a long file.

Copilot in Word comes with Microsoft 365 Personal ($9.99 a month) and higher plans for the subscription owner.

Pick it if your thesis lives in Word and you have Microsoft 365. Skip it if you need a dedicated journal-submission checker.

8. ChatGPT: Best for questions about a section

  • Free plan: Yes, 3 uploads/day
  • Paid from: $8/mo
  • Built-in AI: ChatGPT

ChatGPT reads uploaded .docx and PDF files, with an upload ceiling of 512 MB and 2 million tokens per document, which is an ingestion limit rather than a guarantee that every page gets reviewed. Standard document retrieval extracts the text and discards embedded images. Writing blocks revise a draft in the chat, and the ChatGPT for Word add-in revises selections and adjusts formatting in the document.

The free plan allows up to three file uploads a day, and the Word add-in is available on every plan within its usage limits. ChatGPT Go is $8 a month and Plus $20.

Pick it if you want feedback on a section or help rephrasing. Skip it if you need complex formatting preserved without manual adjustments.

Which tool fits your job

Table 3 matches common thesis and manuscript jobs to the tools above, and notes when Word alone is enough.

JobBest fitWhen Word still wins
Preparing a paper for journal submissionPaperpalThe journal provides its own Word template and checklist
An AI pass over every chapter, reviewed edit by editRevise, Claude for WordYou have Copilot and are happy to work chapter by chapter
Proofreading a finished thesis fileTrinkaYou only need spelling and grammar checks
Writing in LaTeXWritefull, Paperpal on OverleafNot applicable
Catching errors while draftingGrammarlyWord's Editor already covers what you need
Table 3: Which editing tool fits each thesis or manuscript job, and when Word alone is enough.

Citation managers and LaTeX

If your thesis uses Zotero, EndNote, or Mendeley, citations are live fields that the reference manager updates. Zotero distinguishes these fields from plain-text citations. Editing tools that convert text or paste it back can turn fields into plain text, and we couldn’t confirm how each tool here treats them, so try any tool on a copy of one chapter first and check that the citations still update.

For LaTeX, Overleaf has its own Track Changes on premium and some institutional plans, and Writefull and Paperpal work inside Overleaf.

What Word still does best

  • It lets you work directly in a required Word template.
  • Track Changes and comments let supervisors review edits in the same file.
  • Reference manager plug-ins for Zotero, EndNote, and Mendeley run in Word.
  • Editor offers spelling and grammar checks inside Word.

What each costs

ToolCheapest paid planMonthlyPer yearAI on that plan
PaperpalPrime (billed yearly ($144), $25 month to month)$12/mo$14420,000 grammar and consistency edits, 10,000 words of reference checks a month, and a lite Journal Fit report
RevisePlus (or $72/yr billed annually)$8/mo$72Monthly AI limit, no daily limit. GPT-6 Sol, GPT-6 Astra, Gemini 4 Argon, Muse Wonder, and Claude Opus 5.5 need Pro
TrinkaPremium (billed yearly ($48, promotional, normally $80 a year), $20 month to month)$4/mo$48Editable file proofreading with tracked changes, 1 credit per 5,000 words, 10 credits a month, 25 AI writing requests a month
WritefullPremium (billed yearly ($150), $21 month to month)$12.50/mo$150Premium features in Word and Overleaf
Claude for WordClaude Pro (or $17/mo billed annually)$20/mo$200Included in Pro
GrammarlyPro (billed annually, $30 month to month)$12/mo$1442,000 AI prompts a month
Microsoft WordMicrosoft 365 Personal (or $99.99/yr billed annually)$9.99/mo$99.99Eligible Microsoft 365 plans, with limits. Personal/Family AI benefits are for the owner
ChatGPTChatGPT Go (monthly billing, may include ads)$8/mo$96More messages, uploads, and memory than Free
Table 4: Cheapest paid plan for one person, monthly and per year, and what AI that plan includes. US dollars before tax.

A workflow for editing a long document

  1. Keep a clean copy of the full document before any tool touches it.
  2. Edit one chapter at a time. Chapter-sized passes make changes easier to review.
  3. Ask for edits as tracked changes or suggestions, and review each one rather than accepting everything.
  4. Check names, numbers, quotations, and citations yourself. A wrong fix in a fact is worse than a typo.
  5. Check your institution’s policy on AI tools before using them on assessed work.

The bottom line

For a paper headed to a journal, Paperpal runs more than 30 submission checks. For a whole thesis, Revise, in a separate browser editor, and Claude for Word, on paid Claude plans, propose AI edits as tracked changes you review one at a time, and Trinka returns a proofread file the same way. Writefull suits Overleaf, and Grammarly, Word, and ChatGPT cover general editing. Whichever you use, review every change, especially citations and figures.

Sources

Prices and plan details were checked against each vendor’s own pages on October 16, 2026. Prices are in US dollars as each vendor lists them, and some include local tax. Vendors change plans often, so confirm on the linked page before you buy.

Frequently asked questions

Can AI edit a thesis?
AI tools can proofread and suggest language edits on a thesis, chapter by chapter. They miss some errors and make some incorrect fixes, so review every change, and check your institution's policy on AI use first.
What is the best software for editing a dissertation?
It depends on the job. Paperpal and Trinka add academic checks such as references and journal requirements, Writefull works in Overleaf, and Revise (a separate browser editor) and Claude for Word (paid Claude plans) propose AI edits as tracked changes. Grammarly and Word's Editor cover spelling and grammar while you write.
Is AI editing allowed for a thesis?
Policies differ by university and department. Some allow language editing tools and some restrict AI use on assessed work, so check your institution's policy and ask your supervisor before using AI tools on a thesis.
How do I edit a long document with AI without losing formatting?
Work in a copy, edit one chapter at a time, and use a tool that returns edits as tracked changes or suggestions in the document rather than rewritten text you paste back. Tracked changes don't guarantee that formatting or citation fields survive, so check footnotes, figures, and citation fields afterwards.
Does Grammarly work on a whole thesis?
Grammarly's web editor and uploads take up to 100,000 characters, including spaces, while its Windows and Mac apps have no document-length cap. Usage limits of 50,000 words a day and 150,000 words a month still apply.
What is the difference between proofreading and editing a thesis?
Proofreading fixes surface errors such as spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Editing also addresses clarity, structure, consistency, and argument. Software can suggest proofreading and language edits, while judging structure, argument, and evidence needs a supervisor, a professional editor, or your own review.

Recommended reading